<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of the book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/</link>
	<description>Just responding to what I read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 16:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Smith</title>
		<link>http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been proven wrong too many times to actually trust my future sight anymore*, but I agree with David that books still have a long life ahead of them.

I think we need a technology breakthrough before e-books can really be a big deal, and it&#039;s not just an e-book reader. Rather, laptops will have to develop a much better power source, enabling people to read screens in direct sunlight for hours on end. Getting smaller would help, too.

Why would I lug around an e-book reader when I could lug around a book? They&#039;re the same weight, really... while an e-book reader could hold thousands of books, I&#039;m not going to be reading thousands of books a day. I&#039;m going to be reading one or two. A physical book is 

A huge step forward in laptop technology, on the other hand, might solve that problem. I carry my laptop around with me anyway, so it might be cool to have books on it.

Actually, I already do have a lot of roleplaying books (the ones I don&#039;t plan to collect, really) in e-book form, because they&#039;re used more for reference than actual reading. And I read articles online now (though I still get Economist and Foreign Affairs in print). But I&#039;m not ready to make the same switch for fiction and non-fiction.

I think it&#039;ll eventually happen. But it&#039;s not there yet. There&#039;s a romanticism to books that there just wasn&#039;t to CDs or video tapes. Fighting against that won&#039;t be easy.

-Jeff
*Except on defense matters, music, comic books, and other peoples&#039; relationships, mind you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been proven wrong too many times to actually trust my future sight anymore*, but I agree with David that books still have a long life ahead of them.</p>
<p>I think we need a technology breakthrough before e-books can really be a big deal, and it&#8217;s not just an e-book reader. Rather, laptops will have to develop a much better power source, enabling people to read screens in direct sunlight for hours on end. Getting smaller would help, too.</p>
<p>Why would I lug around an e-book reader when I could lug around a book? They&#8217;re the same weight, really&#8230; while an e-book reader could hold thousands of books, I&#8217;m not going to be reading thousands of books a day. I&#8217;m going to be reading one or two. A physical book is </p>
<p>A huge step forward in laptop technology, on the other hand, might solve that problem. I carry my laptop around with me anyway, so it might be cool to have books on it.</p>
<p>Actually, I already do have a lot of roleplaying books (the ones I don&#8217;t plan to collect, really) in e-book form, because they&#8217;re used more for reference than actual reading. And I read articles online now (though I still get Economist and Foreign Affairs in print). But I&#8217;m not ready to make the same switch for fiction and non-fiction.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;ll eventually happen. But it&#8217;s not there yet. There&#8217;s a romanticism to books that there just wasn&#8217;t to CDs or video tapes. Fighting against that won&#8217;t be easy.</p>
<p>-Jeff<br />
*Except on defense matters, music, comic books, and other peoples&#8217; relationships, mind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Schleicher</title>
		<link>http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Schleicher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewcompton.org/2007/04/03/the-future-of-the-book/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see this happening...nobody wants to read a book off a digital screen .  It hurts the eyes.  Something like this may have its place for articles/news/short-stories/magazine type stuff...but full length books, I just don&#039;t see a demand for that...though who knows, only time will tell.  As a writer, I know that e-books just don&#039;t sell...so I don&#039;t see how an &quot;interactive iPod type device for ebooks&quot; is going to make them any more appealing.  Sometimes, nothing beats the printed word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see this happening&#8230;nobody wants to read a book off a digital screen .  It hurts the eyes.  Something like this may have its place for articles/news/short-stories/magazine type stuff&#8230;but full length books, I just don&#8217;t see a demand for that&#8230;though who knows, only time will tell.  As a writer, I know that e-books just don&#8217;t sell&#8230;so I don&#8217;t see how an &#8220;interactive iPod type device for ebooks&#8221; is going to make them any more appealing.  Sometimes, nothing beats the printed word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
