Posted by: Matt Compton | April 12, 2008

Osama’s Family

The Bin Laden Family (without Osama)

The Bin Ladens by Steve Coll is easily the best piece of nonfiction I’ve read so far this year. As I was tearing through it, I kept trying to decide whether this book is actually more impressive than Coll’s last — Ghost Wars — which won the Pulitzer Prize.

Now that I’ve finished the final page, I believe it is.

Toward the end of The Bin Ladens, Coll writes:

An FBI analyst summed up the bureau’s assessment of the evidence in a breezy e-mail written in September 2003: There are ‘millions’ of Bin Ladens ‘running around’ and ‘99.999999% of them are of the non-evil variety’

Osama’s father, Mohammed Bin Laden, died in a plane crash in 1967, but his life was nothing short of remarkable. When he left home to seek his fortune, his situation was so desperate that he spent his nights sleeping in a ditch with his younger brother, but gradually, through a combination of luck and hard work, he built a career as the chief builder for the Saudi king. When he died, he left behind a construction empire and more than 50 children. Those children, led first by the London-educated Salem and then the University of Miami-graduate Bakr, extended his legacy and carved out an original place in a rapidly-changing world.

Coll manages to offer a comprehensive and engaging portrait of this entire family. To do so, he taps a mind-boggling wealth of resources and interviews — drawing from first-person accounts, government reports, even financial statements from a divorce proceeding in Los Angeles. The result is riveting and important — I’m positive that people will be reading this book for years in hopes of understanding the world as it has become.

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 11, 2008

Then take offense, it’s stupid.

Jay Bilas, once again showing why he is the best in the business:

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 11, 2008

Critical heroes

I’d read this:

Heroes creator Tim Kring is collaborating with literary critic and novelist Dale Peck on a sci-fi/alternative-history trilogy that was sold at auction to Crown yesterday for an advance said to be worth a staggering $3 million.

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 10, 2008

Get excited.

30 Rock returns tonight, back from its strike hiatus. In anticipation, I watched the Green Week episode on Hulu. I’m happy to report that it is still the funniest 30 minutes of television since Arrested Development.

Also — Hulu is fantastic. Yeah, there are advertisements that you have to sit through, but that’s a small price to pay for all the content. I was positive that the networks would cripple the functionality when they finally released this thing, but that’s so very much not the case. This is a slick and completely enjoyable way to watch television online.

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 9, 2008

Responding to the Lawson haters

Lawson post-loss

In the wake of Saturday’s loss, the only person who has faced more criticism than Roy Williams is Ty Lawson. In my mind, much of this griping is unfounded.

There is no denying that Lawson had a bad game. He didn’t make a jump shot until the final moments of the game, had as many turnovers as assists, and looked a step slow all night. But as I said in the comments below, I’m pretty sure he was playing hurt.

We know that Lawson took a hip check from David Padgett in the last seconds of the Louisville game. We know that the ankle he injured against Florida State never got back to 100 percent and has been heavily wrapped in every game he’s played since coming back. KU’s guards are fast and talented, but lets be honest, we didn’t watch the Ty Lawson we are used to seeing.

There have been more than a few people who have questioned his heart in the wake of the loss. But look at the picture above. Does that look like the image of a kid who didn’t care deeply about the outcome of the game?

I think it’s fair to say that Ty Lawson had more riding on his performance in the tournament than any other player on Carolina’s team. It’s no secret that he has wanted to make the jump to the league for awhile. At the beginning of the season, his prospects looked good, but then came the aforementioned ankle injury. Lawson needed to play at the very top of his game throughout March to leave a positive impression in the minds of NBA scouts. For three games, he did just that. But those aren’t the performances that anyone will remember.

That’s not to say that Lawson was trying to play for himself — the remarkable thing about his talents are how well they complement his teammates and the Carolina system. I believe he wanted a championship, believed that UNC deserved a championship, and in some way, blames himself because we didn’t have a chance to compete on Monday night.

Personally, I’d love to have him back next year, but I’ll be a fan of his no matter what he decides to do.

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 8, 2008

Joga Bonito

What happens when you mix parkour with with futbol?

(via)

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 8, 2008

On Roy and Kansas

If anyone spent time on Inside Carolina last night, they might have noticed that the message boards were glowing hot. It was pretty hard to miss. The reason?

Roy still likes Kansas

With apologies, this isn’t a big deal. I really don’t think anyone expected Roy Williams to be pulling for Memphis last night. I sure wasn’t.

O’l Roy spent the better part of his coaching career at Kansas. In the end, he came home and won us a title in 2005, so by any measure, Carolina got the better end of the deal. In a decade or so, he will retire here, and in the mean time, he’s going to keep on signing great kids, keep on winning lots of games, and keep on having us compete for more national championships. In other words, the 2008 Final Four aside, we continue getting the better end of the deal.

I wasn’t happy about the Jayhawk sticker. After Saturday night, it felt like a punch in the stomach. But there is absolutely no reason to question our coach’s ultimate loyalty.

If anything, this lets us end the rift with Kansas. After last night, we’re back to being sister programs. There’s way too much cross pollination between the two schools (Dean Smith, Larry Brown, Roy Williams) for us to fight forever. Now surely, KU fans will let their bitterness go.

Update: More from THF

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 8, 2008

Another well-earned Pulitzer

Looking over the list of journalism winners, I see that the Gene Weingarten’s Washington Post story Pearls Before Breakfast won an award for feature writing. This fantastic piece details an experiment arranged by the paper during the morning rush hour at L’Enfant Plaza last January:

No one knew it, but the fiddler standing against a bare wall outside the Metro in an indoor arcade at the top of the escalators was one of the finest classical musicians in the world, playing some of the most elegant music ever written on one of the most valuable violins ever made. His performance was arranged by The Washington Post as an experiment in context, perception and priorities — as well as an unblinking assessment of public taste: In a banal setting at an inconvenient time, would beauty transcend?

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 7, 2008

Barnes & Noble’s bad return policy

I ran down to Chinatown yesterday and visited the Barnes & Noble on 12th Street. I walked around, caught my breath, and scoped out a few books which had caught my interest. Then, as I was leaving, I noticed a sign detailing a new return policy.

Apparently, the entire chain now only accepts returns within 14 days, and then, only with a receipt. I stopped to ask a clerk why they had made the change, and she explained that many retail stores (not just those which sold books) were going to this model — B&N just felt the need to keep up with current trends. She did tell me about one exception, however — books received as gifts can be returned within 30 days so long as there is a gift receipt.

On the whole, this is an awful policy — one which only serves to hurt the store’s best customers.

Books aren’t like other some other commodities; one sold at Store A will have the exact same content as one sold at Store B. It’s not as if B&N faces a wave of people trying to return knockoff versions of the new John Grisham novel.

Barnes & Noble is a powerful chain — with a massive, efficient infrastructure which allows it to set prices for its best sellers as low as it wants them. There surely isn’t some epidemic of costumers attempting to make a profit by returning books bought with steeper discounts at other places.

Most bookstores only accept returns that are in new condition — that means the spine must be unbroken, the pages clean, the cover crisp. I can’t imagine that B&N is facing a horde of bibliophiles who are using the store as a personal library, buying scores of books and then returning them upon completion.

I’d love to read a good reason for this change, but even considering how much time I spend with books, in bookstores, I’m struggling to come up with one. This just seems like a big chain that doesn’t care about the convenience of its costumers at all.

Forcing someone to have a receipt, even for a book that has been given as a gift, is certainly within the rights of the store, but it seems unnecessary and mean-spirited. More obnoxious still is the fact that fourteen days is an undeniably short window of time to arrange for a return if a book is unwanted but an awfully long period of time in which to keep up with a slip of paper.

For many costumers this might not be a big deal. For those who read the most, however, I can promise that it will pose problems. A true bibliophile always run the risk of discovering that she has just bought a copy of a book that already exists in her library. Her friends always run the risk of gifting a duplicate.

I’ve tried to defend the chain bookstore in the past. They offer neighborhoods all across this country a wealth of resources and knowledge that would have seemed unbelievable just a few decades in the past. They lower the barriers of access, and through competition with each other, make books more affordable. In many ways, they are a remarkable cultural innovation. But actions like this make it hard for me to keep singing their praises.

The book business is on the cusp of some fundamental changes.

Amazon has already brought about significant shifts in the business model — driving down consumer costs even more, opening up a back catalogue of every book in print, offering used booksellers a marketplace that reaches a seemingly-infinite number of customers.

With the release of the Kindle, the web company is well on its way to something even more revolutionary. Others have released electronic book devices in the past. Some have even had a measure of success. None, though, comes close to the Kindle. It’s not a pretty device, but months after its release, there is still a waiting list to get access to it. The pricing and access to new releases are both awesome. Even more importantly, you can buy new books instantly and anywhere. And, of course, using the Kindle, you can carry hundreds of books everywhere, all the time.

I already buy many of my books from Amazon. I’m probably less than a year away from making an investment in a Kindle or a comparable gadget (come on Apple, let’s see what you’ve got). Policies like those of Barnes & Noble are pushing me to choose a digital future faster than I otherwise would. And I’m a guy who easily buys 100 books a year. All of which leaves me to wonder — what kind of future do the chain stores have?

Posted by: Matt Compton | April 7, 2008

Defiance

This looks pretty darn good.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started