Posted by: Matt Compton | March 20, 2008

My lunch is safe

Yesterday, in a post on The Democratic Strategist, I made a bet. I said this video of Barack Obama’s ‘More Perfect Union’ speech would hit 2 million views before the end of the week. It topped that number sometime this morning. Remember — these numbers don’t reflect casual viewers — YouTube only tallies viewers who watch a video all the way through the end.

If you haven’t seen it yet, check out something extraordinary — the must honest and complex speech on race that I can remember in my lifetime:

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 17, 2008

Three candidates, three media strategies

As the presidential race stands today, there are three candidates will a real shot at winning the White House — Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama. Each has different policies and plans, strategies and tactics. But the way that each interacts of them interacts with the mainstream media is worth exploring a bit because it helps us see a fundamental difference between them.

Back in 2007, when Hillary Clinton was way ahead in the polls, much of the horse race coverage focused on her ‘well-financed and hyperdisciplined campaign.’ The reality, as we now know, is a little different — Hillaryland has never been efficient, and the campaign burned through its record-breaking war chest before Super Tuesday. But discipline is the signature of her press shop, however.

In August, Joshua Green — a writer for the Atlantic — wrote a story for GQ that examined some infighting in the Clinton campaign. The magazine was also scheduled to write a big cover story about Bill Clinton for its Man of the Year issue. Aides for the campaign quickly gave GQ a choice — spike the Green story or lose access to WJC. The Clinton press staff keeps score — their goal each day is to win news cycles and control expectations. The candidate and her surrogates stay on message, and leaks are kept to a minimum. Everything is planned out, scripted, and well-run. It’s a traditional campaign, but near-perfectly executed.

In 2000, during his first presidential bid, John McCain began calling his caravan the Straight Talk Express. In contrast to his opponents, then and now, McCain’s media strategy is largely unscripted. His best moments are not on the debate stage or in a victory speech, but on his campaign bus, where he holds court with reporters in free-wheeling, stream of consciousness discussions. No topic is off-limits, and the press loves him for it. McCain has a press shop, of course, and his aides work to control stories and shape the message. But those efforts are overshadowed by the personal appeal of the candidate himself. By sheer force of personality and intelligence, McCain has earned himself some of the best political coverage in the campaign.

Barack Obama’s strategy stands in contrast to both of his rivals, but his approach is no less successful. His press aides put out releases and advisories, they organize conference calls and interviews, but largely, they don’t try to shape the narrative of the campaign through the media. I’ve written a lot about their effort to bypass the traditional political filters to reach voters directly through new technology and very old-school organizing, and I won’t repeat it here.

But we’re now far enough into the race that we’re starting to see the results. Obama’s press coverage has been incredibly favorable, but at the same time, he’s been completely unable to escape from the weight of expectations. For instance, after Super Tuesday, the Clinton campaign claimed a big come-from-behind victory in Massachusetts, even though the polls in the state were consistently in her favor. Obama is glowing with the aura of a front runner, but if he stumbles in Wisconsin next week, he won’t be able to stop the campaign narrative from changing again.

By comparison, Hillary Clinton has had a harder time in the media, particularly in the wake of her loan to the campaign at the end of January and the resignation of her top political aide on Tuesday night. There’s no doubt that both Obama and McCain get better coverage, as a rule. But she owes her continued political life to the fact that no one in the press wants to be the first to write off the Clintons. If the situation of the two candidates were reversed — if Obama were behind in delegates, votes, and money after losing 8 different states in a row — his obituary would have already been written, and the cable new shows would be fully booked with party elders asking Obama to step aside in the name of unity. That’s a testament to the strength and skill of her media operation.

As expected, John McCain’s press coverage has been uniformly favorable. He’s won a conservative majority in exactly two states, and despite being crowned the front runner, he’s still losing almost half the votes in primaries all across the country to Mike Huckabee. True, the math has now made John McCain the nominee — Huckabee just doesn’t have the delegates to catch up. But there remain deep concerns in the conservative base of the GOP about John McCain’s candidacy, and most of the coverage about the campaign just doesn’t reflect this sense of unease. Beyond that, the way the press talks about McCain is deeply ingrained — he’s described as a maverick, a hero, and a man who appeals to independents.

No matter which Democrat gets the nod, McCain’s popularity in the press will be a challenge to face. The best way for each to do that is likely to take some cues from the other. If it’s Obama, he will have to find a way to control expectations. If it’s Clinton, she’ll have to find a way to build some of the same new roads to voters that Obama has used with such success. Either way, as the campaign moves from the primary to the general, the nominee will have to adapt.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 13, 2008

Random Tuesday in February

Yesterday, I stepped off the metro at Eastern Market, and walked right into an impromptu rally for Barack Obama. Mayor Fenty had taken the senator around the neighborhood, and then they’d gone to Dunkin Donuts to buy coffee for some campaign workers. Unable to get rid of my grin, I got into the receiving line. As Obama passed by, I reached out, gave him a two-handed shake, and said, “Good luck today, Senator.” He looked right back at me and said, “We appreciate that.”

The scene was full of cameras, and as I watched MSNBC yesterday, I saw the rally in the loop footage as they talked about the campaign. Then, as I logged onto the New York Times last night, I saw this picture:

The New York Times

I’m in there, but probably too small for you to see.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 13, 2008

Just asking…

Last night, Barack Obama won blowout victories in three huge contests — Virginia, DC, and Maryland. Today, every major news channel is completely focused on Roger Clemens and his testimony about steroids before Congress. For the first full news cycle after an important set of wins, no one is talking about the presidential campaign at all. Does that help him or hurt him?

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 12, 2008

Vice President Burr?

With McCain way ahead in the GOP race (hard to say that he has locked it up after this weekend, but still), Vice President speculation has already started. Given McCain’s age and his problems with the conservative wing of the Republican party, that pick has taken on an extra level of significance. The person McCain chooses won’t just be his hand-picked successor in the next election, he or she might become the president before McCain’s term is out.

The most popular choice, right now, seems to be Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty. There’s more than a little support for Mike Huckabee. But, there’s also been a whole lot of talk about NC Sen. Richard Burr. See this column by Fred Barnes, for starters.

Burr was an early and enthusiastic McCain supporter, going so far as to stump for the senator in NH (where he caused a bit of a stir for campaigning without socks). Word in North Carolina circles is that the two men like and trust each other.

He’s real young, but seen as a rising star. He’s got an awful good conservative record. And — just being honest here — in person, he’s really smart and charismatic.

The Associated Press has gone so far as to ask Burr if he would be McCain’s running mate, if asked. And Burr did not say no.

There are, of course, a lot of reason why Burr might not get picked to be McCain’s VP. But back in 2000, another first term NC Senator popped up on Al Gore’s short list, and John Edwards used that attention to expand his national profile and build a nation-wide following. It’s not all that hard to imagine that happening again.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 5, 2008

So Super Tuesday won’t be decisive…

If you’re looking for a road map of where the Democratic primary process goes from here, I’ve got one up on the Strategist.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 4, 2008

A quick word about turnout

Ed Kilgore and I have written a quick analysis of the upswing in voter turnout thus far in the primary and what it means for Democrats going forward.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 1, 2008

Edwards at rest

Edwards in the Dean Dome

Anyone want to bet that JRE was having more fun in Chapel Hill than the folks at the Kodak Theatre last night?

PS — I love Cate Edwards rocking the old school mascot t-shirt.

Posted by: Matt Compton | February 1, 2008

A couple quick post debate observations

As most people have noted, tonight’s Democratic presidential debate was a fairly tame affair (the 18th such joint appearance that these two candidates have made, I believe). But a couple quick points:

  • You can say what you want about Democrats, but it’s undeniable that we throw a good party. Given that this debate was at the Kodak Theatre — better know as the home of the Oscars — I guess you would expect a pretty extravagant show. But that’s exactly what this was. It seems like every single one of CNN’s cutaways featured a famous face from film or television. The crowds outside were so large and enthusiastic, you’d think the red carpet really were out. The whole thing made last night’s GOP debate seem a little tired.
  • Outside, it seemed that the Obama organization had an edge — they did a better job getting their supporters and signs in front of the CNN cameras. But inside the debate hall, the crowd seemed pretty even split. Hillary definitely got the loudest applause line of the night.
  • I, for one, was really glad that CNN had the two candidates on stage seated next to each other. I was really worried that there was going to be another pair of podiums. Neither candidate seemed to want to really go after the other tonight, so maybe this concern wouldn’t have mattered. But I think we as a party are better served when our next nominee for President isn’t pointing fingers and savaging her/his rival.
  • Though it was a small thing, the end of the debate was a really nice moment for Obama. After all the talk early in the week of some sort of State of the Union night snub, he very quietly helped Sen. Clinton out of her chair once the debate was over. Then two of them embraced, whispered something to each other, and shared a private laugh. They were both probably under strict orders from their advisors to make this kind of show, but it was nice nevertheless.
Posted by: Matt Compton | January 31, 2008

Obama’s fundraising madness

This afternoon, I wrote a post for the Strategist about Obama’s sick fundraising numbers for the month of January. A couple minutes after I sent it in, the campaign out an email, asking for more donors. Now, the entire website is down.

I know the campaign has committed serious resources to maintaining servers. The response to this email must have simply been unimaginable. I wonder how much this downtime is costing them. Is 100k an hour too high an estimate?

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started